FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in   

Bug Reports: SEDB32D, MP4 v4.593, SEDCS v3.2.4
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Official SEOW Forum Index -> Technical Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PA-Findo



Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

grrrr Twisted Evil lol i hate you Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
II/JG77Hawk_5



Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 135
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

IV/JG7_4Shades wrote:
Thanks 5, I always seem to forget that adjustment. It is really easy to do, just edit MP4/SOG/GS_SOG_Definitions.php and add definitions lines for the two sectors (with spaces removed from their names).

Cheers,
4S


Too easy!! Done and fixed.
Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Notice:

A patch release is due very shortly. This patch will correct an intermittent bug with the MP Radar Screen, an annoying bug with the Radar Control host seat selection in the DCS, various minor errors in the DB loads. But, most excitingly, the patch will also include SEOW support for:

1. a new Central Med map (by Gross and Dax)
2. a new Midway Large map (by Charlie)
3. a new Korea map (by Dore)

Things are really moving fast!

Cheers,
4Shades
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mising Corsair MkII loadouts:

Code:

air.F4UCORSAIR2   2x154dt   2 x 154 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   1x178dt   1 x 174 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   1x178dt2x154dt   1 x 174 Gallon DT + 2 x 154 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   2x1541x178dt   2 x 154 Gallon Napalm + 1 x 174 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   1x5002x154dt   1 x 500 lb General Purpose Bomb + 2 x 154 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   2x500   2 x 500 lb General Purpose Bomb
air.F4UCORSAIR2   1x10002x154dt   1 x 1000 lb General Purpose Bomb + 154 Gallon DT
air.F4UCORSAIR2   2x1000   2 x 1000 lb General Purpose Bomb

_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PA-Dore



Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 368
Location: Savoie-France

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Shades Wink

I'm checking the new KTO map (2 or 3 days it will be done), but I have some problems when I put in the template a F9F2 Panther (of course I am in 1950!)... No problem with all others planes. I have checked tables, F9F2 seems OK in object_specifications, object_costs and aircraftloadout tables.
If I replace the F9F2 by a F80 Shooting Star it runs well.

I cannot obtain the MP map where is the F9F2's airbase, all others sectors are OK. I have this message:

Message : ';' attendu
Ligne : 337
Caractère : 234
Code : 0
xxxxx/MP4/KTO/KTO_Sector_H.php
Message : 'SchedMission' est indéfini.
Ligne : 388
Caractère : 9
Code : 0
xxxxx/MP4/KTO/KTO_Sector_H.php
Message : 'NSchedMissions' est indéfini.
Ligne : 30
Caractère : 10
Code : 0
xxxx/MP4/Scripts/MP-Body.js
Message : 'TURequest' est indéfini.
Ligne : 412
Caractère : 9
Code : 0
xxxx/MP4/KTO/KTO_Sector_H.php

--> New release Radar runs without problems Wink but we have to take care not to create too large sector maps, because radar works correctly only if the whole map is in the screen. If it's too large, icons are not located at the right place, even when we refresh. You have explain in Seow Wiki that it would perhaps better to create a special radar map for each case (small maps, large maps...) ? I'll do that for KTO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Dore,

Let me download your KTO stuff if it is ready. I am happy to debug the F9F2 problem. Smile

Cheers,
4S
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PA-Dore



Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 368
Location: Savoie-France

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Link sent by email with 2 templates

Thanks Shades Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The error lies in the F9F2 loadouts defined in the Aircraft_Loadout table. The Description field contains a " character and a \ character for a couple of F9F2 loadouts. Remove these characters, and all works. Smile

Cheers,
4Shades
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PA-Dore



Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 368
Location: Savoie-France

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fine Shades, as usual you're the best unbugger chief!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another bug came to light whilst I was working on Dores KTO additions. In his test template Dore was using the overstrength platoons available in HSfX4 for some tanks, e.g. there is a "10-T34_85" Chief object that as 10 separate moving tanks combined into the single Chief. This is diferent to the usual maximum 4 tanks per Chief.

SEOW DCS did not handle this as gracefully as it should have, so I have fixed it. This DCS release will constitute a DCS patch to be released with the "Korea", "Central Med" and "Midway Large" sectors recently contributed.

Cheers,
4Shades
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PA-Dore



Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 368
Location: Savoie-France

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Missing:
P-47D-22.1x10002x500 1x1000lb.Bomb+2x500lb.Bombs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Medar let me know about a bug in the Airforce_Units table. The Country field "New Zealand" should be "NewZealand". The following SQL remedies this:

Code:
UPDATE Airforce_Units SET Country='NewZealand' WHERE Country='New Zealand';


This problem has symptom that if a NZ air regiment is allocated for duties in your sector and you attempt to issue air reinforcements, then the MP sector map screens will not load correctly.

Thanks Medar!

Cheers,
4Shades
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VF-51_Cobraj



Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are the files all updated then with these changes from bug reports? Thank you. Starting a new DB just wanted to check.

Thank you!
_________________
Regards,

Air Group 51 / 51 Group, CO
=Cobraj=

www.airgroup51.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IV/JG7_4Shades



Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1841
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Cobraj,

I am in between releases at the moment, so the SEDB32D database available for download does not have all the bug fixes listed in this thread.

The VB solution I gave you has also moved on since DCS v3.2.5 a little, as has the MP. I will give you a link to d/l a provisional SEDB32E Reference.

Cheers,
4Shades
_________________
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
102nd-YU-Devill



Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi all,
I am not sure if this is the right place or if it has been reported before, but the name for a unit "Autobelinda Scoutcar" is wrong, it should be "Autoblinda Scoutcar" without the "e".
Cheers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Official SEOW Forum Index -> Technical Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum