Search found 268 matches
- Wed 22 Feb 2012 7:07 am
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Channel Map
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1740
- Tue 21 Feb 2012 5:41 am
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Channel Map
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1740
Channel Map
I'm thinking of doing a Dieppe Raid campaign and I see the Channel map is rated fair. I have some issues myself with this map in so far as it occasionally causes low frame rates. Is there any other reason not to use it?
- Tue 14 Feb 2012 12:17 am
- Forum: Campaign Development Notes
- Topic: CV-6 Action Reports and Logs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8513
- Wed 08 Feb 2012 9:38 pm
- Forum: Campaign Noticeboard
- Topic: SEOW Scripted Campaign - Operation Detachment v2.0
- Replies: 42
- Views: 33230
This thing is a bitch. Not only did I fail to find the IJN supply ship but I ran out of fuel on my way back due to careless planning. It took me a half an hour to calculate wind speed effects etc to get the right course. Then it says I died (bastard computer). I clearly remember sitting not 10k from...
- Tue 07 Feb 2012 6:04 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Simulating Bridge Construction
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1543
I was listening in while the GIAP set up there next campaign and they wanted to use unrestricted movement for ground forces. They also wanted to restrict crossing rivers some what so they decided to use the honor system and only allow crossings if engineer units were present. Keep in mind I'm not ac...
- Mon 06 Feb 2012 7:31 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Simulating Bridge Construction
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1543
Simulating Bridge Construction
Is there a way to simulate bridge construction using engineers?
- Fri 03 Feb 2012 5:26 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Selected Aircraft not created
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6047
I had this same problem on the Korea map and without an intense attempt to Analise it I assumed that the current database (SEDB33C) had changes that prevented it from working as it had in the previous release. I didn't report it as a bug because I didn't want to take the time to resolve it to someth...
- Wed 01 Feb 2012 11:54 pm
- Forum: Campaign Noticeboard
- Topic: SEOW Scripted Campaign - Operation Detachment v2.0
- Replies: 42
- Views: 33230
- Wed 01 Feb 2012 2:33 pm
- Forum: Campaign Noticeboard
- Topic: SEOW Scripted Campaign - Operation Detachment v2.0
- Replies: 42
- Views: 33230
- Wed 01 Feb 2012 6:22 am
- Forum: Campaign Noticeboard
- Topic: MiG Alley
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8816
- Tue 31 Jan 2012 8:34 am
- Forum: Campaign Noticeboard
- Topic: SEOW Scripted Campaign - Operation Detachment v2.0
- Replies: 42
- Views: 33230
- Tue 31 Jan 2012 7:41 am
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Setup SEOW Radar from local machine to remote SEOW webserver
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12949
- Tue 31 Jan 2012 5:23 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Flushing Missions in progress
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1631
- Tue 31 Jan 2012 2:03 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Flushing Missions in progress
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1631
Flushing Missions in progress
I set my Henderson campaign up to have one hour missions and planning to 90 minutes. I did these because simulating rearming and refueling at Henderson field should take about an hour. Japanese flights will still be in the air at the end of an hour obviously so I wanted to plan them easily past the ...
- Mon 30 Jan 2012 7:48 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Error 9
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1544
Thanks for reminding me 4Shades. I corrected it during testing by reducing the number of units in my Infantry Task Force. Unfortunately I have no idea what my opponent may be doing. I tested my theory that this was the problem by eliminating my task forces which reduced the number of Error 9s but st...