Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:58 pm
Thank you.IV/JG7_4Shades wrote:Tanker is now Allied.
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:05 am
S!
The starting date is otherwise good, but we might miss it, since most of us will be going to the Finnish Virtual Pilots Association's winter meeting "Urban Blitz".
http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/con ... blitz2012/
But if we get there and setup our computers in time, we will try to make it to the mission
-LLv34_Untamo
The starting date is otherwise good, but we might miss it, since most of us will be going to the Finnish Virtual Pilots Association's winter meeting "Urban Blitz".
http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/con ... blitz2012/
But if we get there and setup our computers in time, we will try to make it to the mission
-LLv34_Untamo
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:41 am
I think i might try to get in on this one...
Launch time is 2015-2030 GMT on thursdays i gather....only one mission per week??
On what side is Hawk5 and the 242 guys??...ill probabily want to side with them.
Launch time is 2015-2030 GMT on thursdays i gather....only one mission per week??
On what side is Hawk5 and the 242 guys??...ill probabily want to side with them.
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:28 am
242 Squadron is on the Allied side, you're most welcome
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:48 am
Hi Untamo, nice to see You again... this time on opposite side! 
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:45 am
Unfair! I'm so blind I need you as my radar operator!150GCT_Pag wrote:Hi Untamo, nice to see You again... this time on opposite side!
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:31 am
Sorry, we have no radar this time (I'm almost blind anyway , also in real life )
)Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:47 am
Actually Japan had radar technology in WWII (though not as good as the USA) so we plan to enable few radars for Japan, as well. But USA will still have more of them.150GCT_Pag wrote:Sorry, we have no radar this time (I'm almost blind anyway , also in real life
Diego and I are polishing the last things on the template, we plan to give MP access to both factions shortly.
Maraz
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:57 pm
You could maybe give the Allies IFF and not the IJN to further reflect the technological differance. ?
(The allies certainly had this in their aircraft by this point.)
Its a simple radar setting that you can enable (side specific) or not when you set the campaign settings upon first initialisation.
It wouldn't make a big differance (the allies would see colours for side on their radar screen, for the IJN every contact would be green) but would be a nice touch.
(The allies certainly had this in their aircraft by this point.)
Its a simple radar setting that you can enable (side specific) or not when you set the campaign settings upon first initialisation.
It wouldn't make a big differance (the allies would see colours for side on their radar screen, for the IJN every contact would be green) but would be a nice touch.
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:18 pm
That's a good idea, to reflect superior radar technology by the US.242Sqn_Chap wrote:You could maybe give the Allies IFF and not the IJN to further reflect the technological differance. ?
(The allies certainly had this in their aircraft by this point.)
Its a simple radar setting that you can enable (side specific) or not when you set the campaign settings upon first initialisation.
It wouldn't make a big differance (the allies would see colours for side on their radar screen, for the IJN every contact would be green) but would be a nice touch.
Thanks
Maraz
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:36 pm
Done.
Futhermore:
1. We'll insert few submariners and supply points for B-24
2. CC enabled for ships
3. Apply Penalties for Failing to Land at Destination removed
Futhermore:
1. We'll insert few submariners and supply points for B-24
2. CC enabled for ships
3. Apply Penalties for Failing to Land at Destination removed
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:28 am
22GCT_Gross wrote:Done.
Futhermore:
1. We'll insert few submariners and supply points for B-24
2. CC enabled for ships
3. Apply Penalties for Failing to Land at Destination removed
Thanks Gross,
I see the changes to the emplate taking effect, they are looking very nice! very good update to an otherwise old template. I can see it now has many up to date HSFX objects
It's shaping up to be a very interesting campaign!
Please let us know when the template is finalized and let us know if we can start planning.
Cheers,
ViFF
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:51 pm
Very nice Idea Guys. A touch of more realism for a Great Campaign!6S.Maraz wrote:That's a good idea, to reflect superior radar technology by the US.242Sqn_Chap wrote:You could maybe give the Allies IFF and not the IJN to further reflect the technological differance. ?
(The allies certainly had this in their aircraft by this point.)
Its a simple radar setting that you can enable (side specific) or not when you set the campaign settings upon first initialisation.
It wouldn't make a big differance (the allies would see colours for side on their radar screen, for the IJN every contact would be green) but would be a nice touch.
Thanks
Maraz
ThanksPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:48 pm
Notice about wind: admins have thought that carrier operations would have been too difficult/dangerous in presence of wind. So in this campaign there will be no wind.
Maraz
Maraz
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:23 pm
Maraz, will you be able to take planes with ordnance and drop tanks off from the CVE carriers with no wind?6S.Maraz wrote:Notice about wind: admins have thought that carrier operations would have been too difficult/dangerous in presence of wind. So in this campaign there will be no wind.
Maraz