Page 3 of 4
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:12 am
by 6S.Maraz
Tanker wrote:6S.Maraz wrote:Notice about wind: admins have thought that carrier operations would have been too difficult/dangerous in presence of wind. So in this campaign there will be no wind.
Maraz
Maraz, will you be able to take planes with ordnance and drop tanks off from the CVE carriers with no wind?
Planners will have to keep the carriers moving when launching/recovering planes (as it was in real life).
Wind could introduce a crosswind component (unless planners move the carriers always toward winds, that would be tactically limiting) that could make things very difficult.
Maraz
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:41 am
by =VARP=Gec
what's wrong with difficult? i know i like it
some wind will produce higher unit loss but that was also in the real life.
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:41 am
by Tanker
6S.Maraz wrote:Tanker wrote:6S.Maraz wrote:Notice about wind: admins have thought that carrier operations would have been too difficult/dangerous in presence of wind. So in this campaign there will be no wind.
Maraz
Maraz, will you be able to take planes with ordnance and drop tanks off from the CVE carriers with no wind?
Planners will have to keep the carriers moving when launching/recovering planes (as it was in real life).
Wind could introduce a crosswind component (unless planners move the carriers always toward winds, that would be tactically limiting) that could make things very difficult.
Maraz
It would affect both sides equally.
To maintain position of the carriers the planner would just need to ensure that it was headed into the wind during the first and last 5 or 10% of the mission.
The rest of the mission the TF could head any direction desired.
In IL2 ships can do abrupt 180 degree turns so that no multiple waypoint turns would be needed.
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:04 am
by LLv34_Untamo
S!
Don't know if the campaign rules file contained this info (can't open .rar files on this work computer), but what will be the server IP?
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:55 am
by 22GCT_Gross
89.163.173.82:21000
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:03 am
by IAF.ViFF
Thanks Gross.
Another question: have you allocated space on 22GCT Teamspeak server for the Allies?
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:07 am
by 102nd-YU-Uross
We can use 102nd TS if thats not a problem?
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:10 am
by 22GCT_Gross
ITA TS is available; you can choose any other TS of course.
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:25 am
by =VARP=Vjeran
102nd-YU-Uross wrote:We can use 102nd TS if thats not a problem?
I think 102nd would be the best as we had the meeting there and I can say it can "hold" large amount of users.. S!
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:28 am
by Classic EAF19
May I put my name forward to fly in this campaign on monday nights?
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:47 pm
by 102nd-YU-Uross
Hi Classic, if you do not mind being in non-English environment, I can try to find you a place in 102nd flights. You are more then welcome to join 102nd but I can't promise anything for sure
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:49 pm
by IAF.ViFF
Classic you are also welcome in the IAF...
Cheers,
ViFF
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:06 am
by 22GCT_Gross
Air playability is now set at 36 flights for both side (previous value: 32)
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:02 am
by Classic EAF19
Thankyou Uross and Viff, I officially pledge my allegiance to the allied side and will fly for the US Navy. May I have access to the appropriate forums please.
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:08 pm
by *{64s}Takeshi_I
Hi all,
is it possible for 64 sentai to join the campaign ?
Siam pronti alla morte
Tojo chiamo
Si !