Page 1 of 2
Dead in statistics, landed safely
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:24 pm
by LLv34_Untamo
S!
Me and Icedi are marked as KIA in stats although we landed safely. Any idea why so? We waited several minutes on the field before disconnecting from the server.
EDIT:
Umm.. looking at 07:25:33.. something definitely went wrong
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:29 pm
by EAF331_Starfire
Same here. I made a fantastic landing on one engine with disabled aileron's. Made a small movie after I landed due to the surprise of bieng alive.
I will gladly post the pictures and the movie as proff
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:41 pm
by StG77_Ripgrunwald
The same for me and StG77_CountZero we landed perfectly on airfield.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:58 am
by 72sq_Popale
The same for me and 72sq_Silval, we landed on airfield but we are marked as KIA in stats
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:37 am
by 6S.Maraz
Same here, landed correctly in Scarpanto, listed as KIA.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:48 am
by 22GCT_Perru
Something weird happened to me.
The tail of my Cr42 was cut off by a Bofors round at about 50-70 mt from ground. I hit Ctrl+E immediately, knowing i wouldn't saved myself anyway...
The plane crashed to the ground and it didn't explode. Absolutely NO damage from the crash. My pilot crawled outside the wreck and ran away...
Just sheer luck? (writing this just because i've read the post of the miracolous landing of Starfire...)
Cheers
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:49 am
by AMVI_Enkas
Me too like Maraz, landed correctly in Scarpanto, listed as KIA.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:34 am
by Cipson
It seems that, if a Pilot lands out of the starting airfield, statistics turn his mission as failed, giving the result "Killed in Action".
In my opinion Admins, after having corrected the wrong statistic, should have to eliminate this constrain being, as seen, origin of errors...
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:48 am
by IV/JG7_4Shades
We are working on isolating the cause of the problems. The statistics are not reliable at the moment. I will advise when things are ok.
Cheers,
4Shades
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:52 am
by Classic EAF19
A big thankyou to Shades and Cmirko for your work behind the scenes
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:09 am
by II/JG54_Emil
Damage loggong doesn´t work correct either.
It was JG54_Johann who sank the Cruiser but the stats name JG54_Eman who was the gunner of Johann. Eman got disconnected during the mission, before the attack on the cruiser.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:41 am
by EAF331_Starfire
22GCT_Perru wrote:
Just sheer luck? (writing this just because i've read the post of the miracolous landing of Starfire...)
Cheers
It wasen't "miracolous" for two reasons:
1) Miracles assumes that one have faith. I am a heathren
I only put my faith in sceince (and hard work) and that is not a religion.
2) When it come to pulling off emergency landings I am just so incredible good. I expect the worst but experiance have just made me so good that I barely can stand my self
Had it been a real Blenheim, all the mechanics would have to do was to check the breaks which I had to abuse to avoid some fuc*ed-up som troops from being run over
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:43 am
by EAF331_Starfire
IV/JG7_4Shades wrote:We are working on isolating the cause of the problems. The statistics are not reliable at the moment. I will advise when things are ok.
Cheers,
4Shades
Thanks-
All I need to know to sleep well
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:28 pm
by LLv34_Untamo
Cipson wrote:It seems that, if a Pilot lands out of the starting airfield, statistics turn his mission as failed, giving the result "Killed in Action".
In our case at least, we returned to the same field we started from.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:58 pm
by Classic EAF19
We had allied pilots return to the wrong airfield but also in stats are KIA