Bug Reports: SEDCSv3.1.x, MP4-v4.360, SEDB31

For bug reports and fixes, installation issues, and new ideas for technical features.

Moderator: SEOW Developers

EJGr.Ost_Chamel
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun 14 Jan 2007 11:37 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by EJGr.Ost_Chamel »

I found a small bug in the names of MP files. In the "North Sea" folder the intel script is named "NorthSea-Intel.php" with an uppercase "I". Therefore the NorthSea-sector does not work on Linux machines (which are casesensitive - unlike Windows).

If anyone has this problem - renaming the file to "NorthSea-intel.php" solves it.

Greetings

Chamel
Kapt
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun 19 Aug 2007 2:07 pm

Post by Kapt »

A problem with airfields in dispute. The axis searchlights are re-spawning in and allied artillery are shooting them out again. Problem is other allied are getting collateral damage from friendly fire.

Image
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

Hi Kapt,

:D

Normally SEOW just spawns searchlights at airbases as required at night time or in bad weather, with nationalities identical to the controlling side. But some people place searchlights in the template, which SEOW regards as scenery objects. All scenery objects are written to each mission file without interpretation.

I'm not sure, but perhaps you have here a case where the red side has captured a formerly blue base, and the scenery searchlights are being inserted each time as blue searchlights.

Anyway, the message is that scenery objects can be inserted and deleted from each mission file as the admin sees fit. SEOW updates the scenery objects list at each Analyze cycle. If you take them out before you fly the mission, then upon the next Analyze SEOW will update the scenery objects list accordingly and they will never appear again.

Cheers,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
Kapt
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun 19 Aug 2007 2:07 pm

Post by Kapt »

Thank you for your reply. 8)

I took a look at the original template and no searchlights. But weather conditions have been poor during both missions that this has occurred. Mission times were 9am then 10am.
I will do as you suggested and remove from build before flying the mission.
Last edited by Kapt on Thu 18 Oct 2007 5:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

That's not exactly what I suggested. From your response it seems that the base is still blue-controlled and the weather is bad enough for blue searchlights to be auto-generated (but not as "scenery objects"). Anyway, deleting them from the mission file won't hurt your campaign.

However, if you control the airbase (turn it red), then the searchlights will generated as red. One way to look at the issue of aircraft destruction happening at the moment is that there are still enemies around causing mischief until you can get a large enough ground force in the vicinity to mop up.

Cheers,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
Kapt
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun 19 Aug 2007 2:07 pm

Post by Kapt »

At the completion of our last mission it was fully changed into Allied control. The next build will answer that question.

Update edit: The base has been completely over run and searchlights have not changed over.
Last edited by Kapt on Thu 18 Oct 2007 5:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
EJGr.Ost_Chamel
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun 14 Jan 2007 11:37 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

modUtilities.intTileCoord: no tile code for coord -x

Post by EJGr.Ost_Chamel »

I think I found a small and uncritical bug.
When a plane crashes at a place with a negative coordinate (x- or y-coordinate, doesn't matter), when analyzing the mission the dcs produces a "Scorched Earth DCS Alert" saying "modUtilities.intTileCoord: no tile code for coord -x". The campaign keeps running without any problem, but the alert is irritating for new and unexperienced players.
So if this is easy to fix, it might be worth the effort. If not ... I can live with it. ;)

Greetings

Chamel
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

Hi Kapt,

Thanks for the report. I have never seen this bug before, so I will check it out.

Cheers,
4S
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

A new bug reported by =69.GIAP=VLADI:

Bridge 76 is missing in the Crimea DB, in grid AJ-7. Thankfully VLADI sent me a logfile showing a destruction event for the bridge, which made it easy for me to capture the following data:

Map Obj_Construction Obj_Name Damage_Name Obj_State Obj_Type Length X_Axis Y_Axis
Crimea Wooden 76 c1 0 Road Bridge 283 91200 63200

This is a new data record to be added to the Bridges table of SEDB.

Cheers,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
242Sqn_Chap
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue 01 Jan 2008 9:49 am

Post by 242Sqn_Chap »

You probably are aware of this one already as its fairly noticable, but just in case you don't:-

In the MP settings, the initial starting intel % for Axis & Allies are displayed the opposite way around to in the DB and SEOW controller.
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

Ah, well spotted!

Thanks,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
BS8th_Bulau
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu 13 Dec 2007 1:45 pm

Post by BS8th_Bulau »

IV/JG7_4Shades wrote:A new bug reported by =69.GIAP=VLADI:

Bridge 76 is missing in the Crimea DB, in grid AJ-7. Thankfully VLADI sent me a logfile showing a destruction event for the bridge, which made it easy for me to capture the following data:

Map Obj_Construction Obj_Name Damage_Name Obj_State Obj_Type Length X_Axis Y_Axis
Crimea Wooden 76 c1 0 Road Bridge 283 91200 63200

This is a new data record to be added to the Bridges table of SEDB.

Cheers,
4Shades
I noticed a couple of bridges missing on the Ostfriesland map, in G5, Northwest corner, there is a road bridge and rail bridge side by side, which don't show up in the Mission Planner. We are using out-of-date versions of everything, so this might have been corrected since. We are planning to update, so I will check it again after that.
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

Yes, correct. The new Bridges table records for Ostfriesland are:
Ostfriesland Metal 19 j 0 Railway Bridge 600 60800 49900
Ostfriesland Metal 32 w 0 Road Bridge 400 60500 49700
This necessitates a change to the corresponding Highway Route 7105 for Ostfriesland. The route needs 4 new waypoints inserted, so the last 5 waypoints of that route in the Highways table now read:
7105 60100 49700 20 24 Ostfriesland
7105 60300 49700 -33 25 Ostfriesland
7105 60700 49700 -33 26 Ostfriesland
7105 60900 49700 20 27 Ostfriesland
7105 61200 49700 20 28 Ostfriesland
And, lastly, the Highway_Intersections table needs a single adjustment:
Ostfriesland 61200 49700 7105 28
Here the last value "28" replaces the old value of "24".

I will release a modified Lite SQL DB for Ostfriesland soon.

Many thanks Bulau!

Cheers,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
PA-Dore
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu 01 Nov 2007 8:58 am
Location: Savoie-France
Contact:

Post by PA-Dore »

Is there some problem to use together?
- Scorched Earth Mission Planner v4.389
- SEDCS v 3.1.7
- SEOW Statistics Tool v1.93

(The latest are:
SEDCS3.1.7 (Aces)
MP4-v4.405 (Aces)
Statistics v1.93 (Aces)
SEDB31Aces
IV/JG7_4Shades
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon 08 Jan 2007 11:10 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by IV/JG7_4Shades »

I would strongly recommend against using MP v3.389 with later DCS as the DCS will offer options that the MP does not support. Of course, you cannot use DCS 3.1.7 wiith any DB older than SEDB31Aces. So if you are going to use SEDB31Aces and DCS 3.1.7, then you ought to just upgrade MP too. :)

Cheers,
4Shades
IV/JG7_4Shades
SEOW Developer

Image
Locked