First mission

6S.Maraz · Post by **6S.Maraz** » Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:44 am

Thanks to all those who attended the first mission.
Thanks to Chap who corrected a problem in statistics.
There was a problem so that the Japanese did not have gound radar in this mission, it will be corrected in next mission.
Apart from that, the server worked well, please report any problem about game crashes, freezes, etc.

Thanks
Maraz

IAF.ViFF · Post by **IAF.ViFF** » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:53 am

From what I saw it was very smooth and very stable.

The ITA server is performing very good

I recommend increasing the plane numbers limit and ship movement limit for both sides.

I think we should increase incrementally to see where the limit is, and then take it down to the last stable plane numbers & ship movements limits to ensure stability for the rest of the campaign.

I don't mind lending ourselves to test this for a couple of missions, I believe its important for the SEOW community.

Cheers,

LLv34_Untamo · Post by **LLv34_Untamo** » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:57 am

S!

Is the planner server down? Tried to go see stats, but can't access it.

http://82.163.173.89 .. Is this correct ip?

-LLv34_Untamo

6S.Maraz · Post by **6S.Maraz** » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:19 am

LLv34_Untamo wrote:S!

Is the planner server down? Tried to go see stats, but can't access it.

http://82.163.173.89 .. Is this correct ip?

-LLv34_Untamo

http://itaseow.servegame.com/SEOW/MP4pu ... efault.php

or

http://89.163.173.82/SEOW/MP4public/Scripts/default.php

Maraz

102nd-YU-Uross · Post by **102nd-YU-Uross** » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:36 am

Several pilots from 102nd had problems with small freezes and sttutering durig mission, but no major problems.

=VARP=Klingon · Post by **=VARP=Klingon** » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:57 pm

Same here,small lags in a beginning..

22GCT_Gross · Post by **22GCT_Gross** » Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:09 pm

Take off the carrier is always fps hungry.