MP restored

22GCT_Gross · Post by **22GCT_Gross** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 1:21 pm

You may realized the MP wont work on full sector and A sector views.
I had to rework the planned database->build->analise->restore the new plannings
I hope now all is fine and you find your plannings.
Something still not well working in the stats, but there is an error on IAF.orig player who seems to be in game but there is no entry as "seat occupied" so he is not recognized in the analysis

IAF.ViFF · Post by **IAF.ViFF** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:03 pm

Its ok with IAF.OriG, there was a problem with his client and he never managed to occupy a seat for the mission.

Classic EAF19 · Post by **Classic EAF19** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:44 pm

Thankyou for the hard work Gross.

I have noticed several discrepancies between the first analysis and the current analysis. There are several loss entries for units that are no where near the unit that allegedly destroyed them, for example action#35 my Matilda tank destroys a Fulmar. Now I know that is not possible as the Fulmar is at a different airfield and in the previous analysis that Matilda was destroying an axis HQ unit at the time. There are several of these errors which have caused losses of units which were not lost. I am sure that Cipson must also be effected by this as I have also noted that some axis previously destroyed are now not destroyed. Events 3,4,5 + 6 are also impossible as an infantry platoon cannot fire that fast. I would think that this analysis needs to be run again.

102nd-YU-devill · Post by **102nd-YU-devill** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:22 pm

We just have to be happy with the state as it is now Classic. Sorry, mate but if you realized how much work Diego, Cmirko and me put into this over the weekend, believe me you wouldn't even mention another mission analysis.
Let it be and we go on tomorrow on schedule, I will compensate you later for this.

Classic EAF19 · Post by **Classic EAF19** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:42 pm

Fair enough, obviously I have no idea how much work goes into the database. All I know of SEOW is how much time I spend in the MP plotting a campaign

102nd-YU-devill · Post by **102nd-YU-devill** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:49 pm

Lol,

take that time, multiply it by 3, remove every gram of eyecandy, increase the eye strain (caused by lines of scrolling text) by 10 times and you'll be in the ballpark with the average DB editing job vs. an average SEOW planning session.

Really mate, only now I see how hard it is myself. I had no idea before.

Classic EAF19 · Post by **Classic EAF19** » Sun Oct 28, 2012 5:07 pm

Ok mate, we'll call you Sparks from now on after all those lines of scrolling text (you can figure it out or ask Neo)

242Sqn_Chap · Post by **242Sqn_Chap** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:39 am

Events 3,4,5 + 6 are also impossible as an infantry platoon cannot fire that fast

Panzergrenadiers Squads (Fallschirmjaeger in this) have an SMG element. This element has very short range but if close enough, do fire very fast.

(put 4x1 moving Panzergrenadiers into FMB and have a look).

22GCT_Gross · Post by **22GCT_Gross** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:05 pm

Gareth, I cannot say anything but the mission was rebuilt using the "planned" database saved by the system just before the first building; the mission was analyzed using the eventlog of the mission played.
The only changes I have done on "planned" database was to replace the 145gruppoT by the 219squadrigliaBT.
And last I have restored all plannings both commanders have input meanwhile.
Nothing else was touched.
I choose this "remake" option after several unsuccessful attempts to understand where the error was hiding.

Classic EAF19 · Post by **Classic EAF19** » Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:10 pm

Its no big deal Gross and thankyou for your efforts. I really have no idea how much time goes into the DB correction and am grateful for your guys efforts. Truly the unsung heroes of all campaigns must be the admins.