New pilot rating logic - test
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:23 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
New pilot rating logic - test
Mike has updated the pilot rating logic in the stats and we have enabled it in this campaign for testing.
Now Ace criteria are more strict but you'll see more veterans among those are playing a lot of missions.
Now Ace criteria are more strict but you'll see more veterans among those are playing a lot of missions.
Last edited by 22GCT_Gross on Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
22GCT_Gross
www.22GCT.it
www.22GCT.it
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: ITALY - Venezia
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: ITALY - Venezia
I point out that the statistics do not indicate that many pilots flew misssione the day on July 1.
This is not very important, but 'most' important is that they are not updated in mission planner.
For example, it does not appear that the transport I sunk in AU13.
This is only for indication and suggestion, it is not a problem of personal statistics.
S!
This is not very important, but 'most' important is that they are not updated in mission planner.
For example, it does not appear that the transport I sunk in AU13.
This is only for indication and suggestion, it is not a problem of personal statistics.
S!
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:13 am
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:23 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Let me better understand.AMVI_Enkas wrote:I point out that the statistics do not indicate that many pilots flew misssione the day on July 1.
This is not very important, but 'most' important is that they are not updated in mission planner.
For example, it does not appear that the transport I sunk in AU13.
This is only for indication and suggestion, it is not a problem of personal statistics.
S!
You are saying not all the players who flew the mission are reported in the stats as players?
I see
Code: Select all
Total: 66 Human Pilots (32 Allied, 34 Axis)
Then you are reporting that some in-game events seem not being parsed in the statistics and in the Mission Planner.
You know the logic of Scorched Earth is parsing the eventlog and updating the database were the Mission Planner extracts the data from to be displayed on the map image background.
Scorched Earth reads the game events by the eventlog that is the only game output provided by IL2.
If the eventlog fails or is somehow corrupted that is mirrored in the database and in the Mission Planner.
I took a brief look at the eventolg regarding your flight and I found:
Code: Select all
10:00:00 B_AMVI_Enkas is trying to occupy seat III_JG1_1001(0)
10:00:00 III_JG1_1001(0) seat occupied by B_AMVI_Enkas at 152368.06 166349.98
10:00:00 III_JG1_1001 loaded weapons 'R3-DROPTANK' fuel 100%
10:01:39 III_JG1_1001 in flight at 153046.28 167610.89
11:12:46 III_JG1_1001 landed at 152463.84 167081.78
11:13:30 B_AMVI_Enkas has disconnected
Consequently no ship sinking has been registered in the database and into the Mission Planner.
22GCT_Gross
www.22GCT.it
www.22GCT.it
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: ITALY - Venezia
Sorry Gross, but it's wrong. And not only for me.
I have flown the mission of 1/7/2013 with : R1 SC500 equipped and sunk the ship. this is out of discussion, Astore and Gheppio see was present.
And as you can see here , this is what we can see with my eventlog :
In fact if you see in my personal statistic page , there doesn't appear the string of the mission of 1 july. But in the general statistic of the mission , insteed result that i sunk the Armed Troopship HMS Empire Nigel Fleet 2, Flotilla 3.
So in the mission planner the ship sunk is not present .
And so i don't know what else.
S!
I have flown the mission of 1/7/2013 with : R1 SC500 equipped and sunk the ship. this is out of discussion, Astore and Gheppio see was present.
And as you can see here , this is what we can see with my eventlog :
In fact if you see in my personal statistic page , there doesn't appear the string of the mission of 1 july. But in the general statistic of the mission , insteed result that i sunk the Armed Troopship HMS Empire Nigel Fleet 2, Flotilla 3.
So in the mission planner the ship sunk is not present .
And so i don't know what else.
S!
-
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:52 am
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:42 am
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:42 am
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:23 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:23 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
My fault was looking at the eventlog from another mission. Sorry.
The ActionData reports the event at 13:37:24 (The unit III_JG5000 destroyed the unit VfSSSR31), and that is what we can see in the mission detail "Complete Combat Actions List".
The Objmissiondata reports the unit VfSSSR31 (HMS Empire Nigel Fleet 2, Flotilla 3) as dissolved (and Quantity=0) at the end of the mission, so the unit now is correctly no more displayed in the Mission Planner.
So database and Mission Planner are reporting the right situation for everyone.
The only mismatch is about personal stats.
What you see in the statistics are html static files that the system automatically generates after the analysis phase.
I have checked that the personal stat page were built only for some players and not for the others. About those player you can see the last built html file (two mission ago).
I should order a complete rebuild of the stats, but since they are going to be rebuilt after the next mission, I would wait for that
The ActionData reports the event at 13:37:24 (The unit III_JG5000 destroyed the unit VfSSSR31), and that is what we can see in the mission detail "Complete Combat Actions List".
The Objmissiondata reports the unit VfSSSR31 (HMS Empire Nigel Fleet 2, Flotilla 3) as dissolved (and Quantity=0) at the end of the mission, so the unit now is correctly no more displayed in the Mission Planner.
So database and Mission Planner are reporting the right situation for everyone.
The only mismatch is about personal stats.
What you see in the statistics are html static files that the system automatically generates after the analysis phase.
I have checked that the personal stat page were built only for some players and not for the others. About those player you can see the last built html file (two mission ago).
I should order a complete rebuild of the stats, but since they are going to be rebuilt after the next mission, I would wait for that
22GCT_Gross
www.22GCT.it
www.22GCT.it
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:13 am
Hi gents one idea..
Could be nice if same kind of award would be created for every campaign, only to remember all the time we spent togheter and for the efforts that every squadron made during the campaign.
I mean for example same kind of certificate with logo, results, points gained or samething else:
-best squadron ( points...)
-best ace
or moore simply a certificate squadron participation to the campaign.
What do you think about that ?
Salute
Could be nice if same kind of award would be created for every campaign, only to remember all the time we spent togheter and for the efforts that every squadron made during the campaign.
I mean for example same kind of certificate with logo, results, points gained or samething else:
-best squadron ( points...)
-best ace
or moore simply a certificate squadron participation to the campaign.
What do you think about that ?
Salute
In memory of all WW2 pilots who sacrified their life for their country......
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:49 pm
- Location: France
We have badges for SEOW campaigns which are awarded to any pilot from 102nd that participates in a campaign. Check them out here, may give you some ideas:
http://102nd.org/en/seow/seow-kampanje
http://102nd.org/en/seow/seow-kampanje
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:00 pm
- Location: ITALY - Venezia
22GCT_Hollywood wrote:Classic EAF19 wrote:Please tell me what is that event log reader program?
@Gross : Diego, i have reported it only for best accuracy.
I am always grateful for the excellent work that you gives us.
[/quote]
Last edited by AMVI_Enkas on Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:23 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
That is an hand-made option.
http://www.22gct.it/home/index.php?opti ... 32&lang=it
http://www.22gct.it/home/index.php?opti ... 32&lang=it
22GCT_Gross
www.22GCT.it
www.22GCT.it