North American Schedule
Moderators: IV/JG7_4Shades, 22GCT_Gross
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
North American Schedule
Here is what we have, so far:
Kuban Sector
=AVG= (USA) - 8 pl. (Allied)
5AF<17RS> (USA) - 2 pl. (Allied)
=69.GIAP= (NA Contingent) - 4pl. (Allied)
JG26, II/JG3K and II/JG54 (USA and Europe) - 12 pl. (Axis)
LW10 and 1./JG77 (USA and Europe) - 12 pl (Axis)
Current suggested schedule is Tuesdays at 0300 GMT, which would be 2200 EST (New York Time). Is this acceptable to all? I have some feedback that Mondays and/or Thursdays are better for some.
Flatspin and I would be happy to take leadership positions on the Allied side of the sector. Additional mission planners from the =AVG= will include Medar, Yoke and Space.
There may be a number of =69.GIAP= members from the US that may enjoy flying for the Allied cause in Kuban during a time zone that better suits them. They would be welcome to assist with strategy and mission planning for their own assets on this map.
I assume Luni, Badger and some others will take leadership positions on the Axis side of this campaign?
I just posted this as a conversation starter. Please add your input and let's get this Kuban thing rolling!
Kuban Sector
=AVG= (USA) - 8 pl. (Allied)
5AF<17RS> (USA) - 2 pl. (Allied)
=69.GIAP= (NA Contingent) - 4pl. (Allied)
JG26, II/JG3K and II/JG54 (USA and Europe) - 12 pl. (Axis)
LW10 and 1./JG77 (USA and Europe) - 12 pl (Axis)
Current suggested schedule is Tuesdays at 0300 GMT, which would be 2200 EST (New York Time). Is this acceptable to all? I have some feedback that Mondays and/or Thursdays are better for some.
Flatspin and I would be happy to take leadership positions on the Allied side of the sector. Additional mission planners from the =AVG= will include Medar, Yoke and Space.
There may be a number of =69.GIAP= members from the US that may enjoy flying for the Allied cause in Kuban during a time zone that better suits them. They would be welcome to assist with strategy and mission planning for their own assets on this map.
I assume Luni, Badger and some others will take leadership positions on the Axis side of this campaign?
I just posted this as a conversation starter. Please add your input and let's get this Kuban thing rolling!
Last edited by =AVG=Storm on Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:47 pm
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:45 pm
- Location: Canada
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:19 pm
- Location: The Democratic People's Republic of Ohio
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Thank you, Tushka!
Here are the stats for our Thursday night mission:
http://groundzeroseow.com/SEOW/MP4/Stat ... index.html
Here are the stats for our Thursday night mission:
http://groundzeroseow.com/SEOW/MP4/Stat ... index.html
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:47 am
- Location: Montgomery, AL (USA)
S~:
Brandle will be our leader I am just Gefrieter. My concern is exactly as Brandle stated that we have JG26 members that reside in Europe. O300 GMT on a Tuesday is going to be impossible for them to fly. Would it be possible for us to have either I prefer #2.
1. Add another scheduled flight time on either a Sat or Sunday say with a start time between 2000-2200GMT. So at least one day we can fly with our European members. I am sure that some of your squads may have european members as well.
2. Add a scheduled flight in our sector Kuban on Tuesday our designated flight time which is at GMT 2100and have the European members of our squadrons run that flight post results etc, then we could fly our mission in our designated time slot of GMT 0300 2200 local (10:00pm EST) based on the previously run mission 6 hours before. Then they would fly it the next week mission the same based on our results. This way it is ongoing. Actually you could run multiple missions a week even daily.
Honestly that is how I thought this whole multisector campaign was going to work, it seems now that we are only having a intersquad battle with a few squads in our time zones on seperate maps. Personally I want to fly all the maps and I want to fly with or at least feel that I am flying with people all over the world. With this proposal all blue and all red would be virtual squad mates just flying in different times like you would in reality. Now you would really have to communicate, pilot logs, recon, supply all that becomes human driven and it includes people forces them to get involved they have a vested interest.
Anyway just my two cents. I will return to my potato peeling duties!
S~ JG2_Badger
Brandle will be our leader I am just Gefrieter. My concern is exactly as Brandle stated that we have JG26 members that reside in Europe. O300 GMT on a Tuesday is going to be impossible for them to fly. Would it be possible for us to have either I prefer #2.
1. Add another scheduled flight time on either a Sat or Sunday say with a start time between 2000-2200GMT. So at least one day we can fly with our European members. I am sure that some of your squads may have european members as well.
2. Add a scheduled flight in our sector Kuban on Tuesday our designated flight time which is at GMT 2100and have the European members of our squadrons run that flight post results etc, then we could fly our mission in our designated time slot of GMT 0300 2200 local (10:00pm EST) based on the previously run mission 6 hours before. Then they would fly it the next week mission the same based on our results. This way it is ongoing. Actually you could run multiple missions a week even daily.
Honestly that is how I thought this whole multisector campaign was going to work, it seems now that we are only having a intersquad battle with a few squads in our time zones on seperate maps. Personally I want to fly all the maps and I want to fly with or at least feel that I am flying with people all over the world. With this proposal all blue and all red would be virtual squad mates just flying in different times like you would in reality. Now you would really have to communicate, pilot logs, recon, supply all that becomes human driven and it includes people forces them to get involved they have a vested interest.
Anyway just my two cents. I will return to my potato peeling duties!
S~ JG2_Badger
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:03 pm
- Location: Norcross Ga.
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:50 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:19 pm
- Location: The Democratic People's Republic of Ohio
- Contact:
Because the first Kuban mission was defective we could not fly it. We should find a day other than Thursday for the next attempt because next two Thursdays are Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve.
I suggest we use this thread to find an alternative.
Of course we will be limited by the time it takes to rebuild the database, reinitialize the campaign and replan the missions.
Because Tuesday evenings are Ground Zero SEOW mission nights, and most pilots on the allied side of Kuban also fly the Ground Zero SEOW missions, perhaps we could replace the scheduled GZ mission with the first Kuban mission?
If possible, would that work for enough axis pilots also?
I suggest we use this thread to find an alternative.
Of course we will be limited by the time it takes to rebuild the database, reinitialize the campaign and replan the missions.
Because Tuesday evenings are Ground Zero SEOW mission nights, and most pilots on the allied side of Kuban also fly the Ground Zero SEOW missions, perhaps we could replace the scheduled GZ mission with the first Kuban mission?
If possible, would that work for enough axis pilots also?
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:47 pm
- Location: USA
S!
I think the Crimea template is going to have the same problems. For some reason we have many stock tables in the database instead of the ones that were built for those sectors. It should not be any problem to flush the databases that were created and just go with the ones I originally sent . Both can be fixed in an hour but all missions planned will be lost and have to be redone.
Brandle
I think the Crimea template is going to have the same problems. For some reason we have many stock tables in the database instead of the ones that were built for those sectors. It should not be any problem to flush the databases that were created and just go with the ones I originally sent . Both can be fixed in an hour but all missions planned will be lost and have to be redone.
Brandle
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:19 pm
- Location: The Democratic People's Republic of Ohio
- Contact: